re:Quoted vs Procore
re:Quoted is built for trade businesses that need fast, on-site pricing. Procore is built for large construction organizations that need deep control over complex projects.
Quick read before the deep dive
Compare the typical customer, setup time, and estimating style in one view.
| Area | re:Quoted | Procore |
|---|---|---|
| Typical customer | Trade businesses, small teams | Mid-size to large construction firms |
| Main job | Fast estimates and quotes | Full project management |
| Time to get started | Minutes | Weeks |
| Training required | No | Yes |
| Mobile use | Primary | Important but shared with desktop |
| Estimating style | Job-based, quick pricing | Takeoffs, bids, detailed estimating |
| Overall complexity | Low | High |
How each product works day to day
This comparison focuses on team size, onboarding, and what happens when you actually need a quote.
Target customer size
Built for trade contractors and small crews who price work daily and need answers fast.
Built for mid-size and enterprise construction companies managing many users, projects, and partners.
Setup and onboarding
- No setup process
- Sign up and create a quote right away
- No training required
- Structured rollout across teams and projects
- Implementation typically takes several weeks
- Training and change management included
Estimating and quoting
- Estimates built from labor, materials, and location-based pricing
- AI helps select materials
- Customer-facing quotes that are easy to send
- Digital takeoffs from plans
- Estimates tied into larger project and financial systems
- Quoting is part of a broader preconstruction workflow
Project tracking and follow-up
- Job status tracking
- Calendar and scheduling
- Follow-up reminders
- Long project timelines
- Many contributors and roles
- Documents, tasks, and cross-company coordination
Customer and financial tools
- Customer records with multiple addresses
- Invoices and payments
- QuickBooks integration
- Support for multiple users
- Financial data managed across larger systems
- Often connected to accounting or ERP platforms
- Built for multi-department workflows
Mobile and desktop use
- Mobile-first workflow
- Designed for quoting on site
- Desktop is supported but secondary
- Used across mobile and desktop
- Field teams rely on mobile
- Office teams handle deep project tasks on desktop
Two tools with different missions
re:Quoted stays focused on quoting
Help trade businesses price jobs quickly without training or setup.
Procore is built for project complexity
Help larger construction teams manage complex projects with many moving parts.
Strengths and trade-offs
re:Quoted
Pros
- Very fast to use
- No training required
- Simple interface
- Works well for daily quoting
Cons
- Not built for large, multi-year projects
- Fewer advanced controls than enterprise systems
Procore
Pros
- Handles complex construction projects
- Strong coordination across teams
- Detailed project oversight
Cons
- Longer setup time
- Requires training
- More complexity than many trade businesses need
Pick the tool that matches how you work
Choose re:Quoted if
- You price jobs often and need quotes out quickly
- You run a trade business with a small or growing team
- You want software that is easy to learn and easy to use
Choose Procore if
- You manage large projects with many people involved
- You need detailed tracking and controls
- You are prepared to invest time in setup and training
Both tools are strong in their space. The right choice depends on whether you need fast quoting or detailed project control.